Artículos para exponer

Unidad I. Selección natural, ecología y conducta

• Allen, O. H. 2009. Testing natural selection. Scientific American January 30-37.
• Levitis, D. A., Lidicker, W.Z. and Freund, G. Behavioural biologists do not agree on what constitutes behaviour. Animal. Behaviour 78:103-110.
• Soler, M. et al.2001.Traducción al español de los términos ingleses más conflictivos utilizados en Etología, Ecología y Evolución. Etología 9:43-46
• Sinervo, B. and Lively, C.M.1996. The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 380:240-242.
• Shaulsky, G. and Kessin, R.H. 2007.The cold war of the social amoebae. Current Biology 17:R684-R692.
• Queller, D.C. and Strassmann, J.E. 1998. Kin selection and social insects. Bioscience 48:165-175.
. Jablonka E. y M. Lamb. 2005. Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral and symbolic variation in the history of life. Mit Press, Cambridge Mass: 52-71.

Unidad II. Ecología del consumo de recursos

• Rahmani, H., Hoffmann, D.Walzer,A. and Schausberger, P. 2009. Adaptive learning in the foraging behavior of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. Behavioral Ecology 20: 946-950. (Forrajeo óptimo)
• Ponton, F., Duneau, D., Sánchez,M.I., Courtiol,A. Anatoli T., Terekhin, A. T., Budilova E. V., Renaud, F. and Thomas, F. 2009. Effect of parasite-induced behavioral alterations on juvenile development. Behavioral Ecology. 20: 1020-1025.(Estrategias de escape al parasitismo)
• Lindstrom, L., Alatalo, R.,Lyytinen, A.and Mappes, J.2001.Predator experience on cryptic prey affects survival of conspicuous aposematic prey. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences 268: 357-361. (Estrategias de escape a la depredación)
• Franks, D.W.and Noblre, J.2004.Warning signals and predator-prey coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences 271 1859-1865. (Coevolución)


Unidad III. Competencia de recursos

• Haila Y. 1982. Hypothetico-deductivism and the competition controversy in ecology. Annales Zoologici Fennici 19: 255-263.
• McGlynn T.P. 2000. Do Lanchester’s laws of combat describe competition in ants? Behaborial Ecology 11 (6): 686-690.
• Pratt A.E., D.K. McLain and G.R. Lathrop. 2003. The assessment game in sand fiddler crab contests for breeding burrows. Animal Behaviour 65: 945-955.
• Relyea R.A. 2000. Trait-mediated indirect effects in larval anurans: reversing competition with the threat of predation. Ecology 81(8): 2278-2289.


Unidad IV. Ecología de la conducta sexual

• Schutze M. K., Yeates D. K., Graham G. C. y Dodson G. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of antlered flies, Phytalmia gerstaecker (Diptera: Tephritidae): The evolution of antler shape and mating behaviour. Australian Journal of Entomology 46: 281 – 293.
• Moreira, P.L. and Birhead, T. R.2003.Copulatory plugs in the Iberian Rock lizard do not prevent insemination by rival males. Functional Ecology.17:796-802 .
• Miller J. A. 2007. Repeated evolution of male sacrifice behavior in spiders correlated with genital mutilation. Evolution: 61: 1301-1315.
• Kwiatkowski, M. A., & Sullivan, B. K. 2002. Geographic variation in sexual selection among populations of an iguanid lizard Sauromalus obesus (=Ater).Evolution. 56:2039-2051.


Unidad V. Conducta social

• Hölldobler B. y E.O. Wilson. 2005. The evolution of communal nest-weaving in ants. In: Sherman P.W. y J. Alcock. Exploring animal behavior, readings from American Scientist: 154-163.

• Aureli F., M. Cords and C.P. van Schaik. 2002. Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. Animal Behaviour 64(3): 325-343.
• Franks N.R., A. Dornhaus, J.P. Fitzsimmons and M. Stevens. 2003. Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological sciences 270: 2457-2463.
• Sosis R. 2005. The adaptative value of religious ritual. In: Sherman P.W. y J. Alcock. Exploring animal behavior, readings from American Scientist: 312-318.
• Johnstone R.A. 1997. Recognition and the evolution of distinctive signatures: when does it pay to reveal identity? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological sciences 264: 1547- 1553.


Unidad VI. Aplicaciones prácticas

• McPhee M.E. 2003. Generations in captivity increases behavioral variance: considerations for captive breeding and reintroduction programs. Biological Conservation 115: 71-77.
• Patrick D.A., A.J.K. Calhoun and M.L. Hunter Jr. 2007. Orientation of juvenile wood frogs, Rana sylvatica, leaving experimental pounds. Journal of Herpetology 41: 158-163.
• Rendon P., J. Sivinski, T. Holler, K. Bloem, M. Lopez, A. Martinez and M. Aluja. 2006. The effects of sterile males and two braconid parasitoids, Fopius arisanus (Sonan) and Diachasmimorpha krausii (Fullaway) (Hymenoptera), on caged populations of Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) at various sites in Guatemala. Biological Control 36: 224-231.
• Robbins R.L. and E.K. McCreery. 2003. Acoustic stimulation as a tool in African wild dog conservation. Biological Conservation 111(2): 263-267.
• Vickery S.S. and G.J. Mason. 2003. Behavioral persistence in captive bears: implications for reintroduction. Ursus 14: 35-43.